Edit

Use query parallelization in Azure Stream Analytics

  • Article

This article shows you how to take advantage of parallelization in Azure Stream Analytics. You learn how to scale Stream Analytics jobs by configuring input partitions and tuning the analytics query definition.

As a prerequisite, you might want to be familiar with the notion of streaming unit described in Understand and adjust streaming units.

What are the parts of a Stream Analytics job?

A Stream Analytics job definition includes at least one streaming input, a query, and output. Inputs are where the job reads the data stream from. The query is used to transform the data input stream, and the output is where the job sends the job results to.

Partitions in inputs and outputs

Partitioning lets you divide data into subsets based on a partition key. If your input (for example Event Hubs) is partitioned by a key, we recommend that you specify the partition key when adding an input to your Stream Analytics job. Scaling a Stream Analytics job takes advantage of partitions in the input and output. A Stream Analytics job can consume and write different partitions in parallel, which increases throughput.

Inputs

All Azure Stream Analytics streaming inputs can take advantage of partitioning: Event Hubs, IoT Hub, Blob storage, Data Lake Storage Gen2.

Note

For compatibility level 1.2 and above, the partition key is to be set as an input property, with no need for the PARTITION BY keyword in the query. For compatibility level 1.1 and below, the partition key instead needs to be defined with the PARTITION BY keyword in the query.

Outputs

When you work with Stream Analytics, you can take advantage of partitioning in the outputs:

  • Azure Data Lake Storage
  • Azure Functions
  • Azure Table
  • Blob storage (can set the partition key explicitly)
  • Azure Cosmos DB (need to set the partition key explicitly)
  • Event Hubs (need to set the partition key explicitly)
  • IoT Hub (need to set the partition key explicitly)
  • Service Bus
  • SQL and Azure Synapse Analytics with optional partitioning: see more information on the Output to Azure SQL Database page.

Power BI doesn't support partitioning. However you can still partition the input as described in this section.

For more information about partitions, see the following articles:

Query

For a job to be parallel, partition keys need to be aligned between all inputs, all query logic steps, and all outputs. The query logic partitioning is determined by the keys used for joins and aggregations (GROUP BY). This last requirement can be ignored if the query logic isn't keyed (projection, filters, referential joins...).

  • If an input and an output are partitioned by WarehouseId, and the query groups by ProductId without WarehouseId, then the job isn't parallel.
  • If two inputs to be joined are partitioned by different partition keys (WarehouseId and ProductId), then the job isn't parallel.
  • If two or more independent data flows are contained in a single job, each with its own partition key, then the job isn't parallel.

Only when all inputs, outputs and query steps are using the same key, the job is parallel.

Embarrassingly parallel jobs

An embarrassingly parallel job is the most scalable scenario in Azure Stream Analytics. It connects one partition of the input to one instance of the query to one partition of the output. This parallelism has the following requirements:

  • If your query logic depends on the same key being processed by the same query instance, you must make sure that the events go to the same partition of your input. For Event Hubs or IoT Hub, it means that the event data must have the PartitionKey value set. Alternatively, you can use partitioned senders. For blob storage, this means that the events are sent to the same partition folder. An example would be a query instance that aggregates data per userID where input event hub is partitioned using userID as partition key. However, if your query logic doesn't require the same key to be processed by the same query instance, you can ignore this requirement. An example of this logic would be a simple select-project-filter query.

  • The next step is to make your query be partitioned. For jobs with compatibility level 1.2 or higher (recommended), custom column can be specified as Partition Key in the input settings and the job will be parallel automatically. Jobs with compatibility level 1.0 or 1.1, requires you to use PARTITION BY PartitionId in all the steps of your query. Multiple steps are allowed, but they all must be partitioned by the same key.

  • Most of the outputs supported in Stream Analytics can take advantage of partitioning. If you use an output type that doesn't support partitioning your job won't be embarrassingly parallel. For Event Hubs output, ensure Partition key column is set to the same partition key used in the query. For more information, see output section.

  • The number of input partitions must equal the number of output partitions. Blob storage output can support partitions and inherits the partitioning scheme of the upstream query. When a partition key for Blob storage is specified, data is partitioned per input partition thus the result is still fully parallel. Here are examples of partition values that allow a fully parallel job:

    • Eight event hub input partitions and eight event hub output partitions
    • Eight event hub input partitions and blob storage output
    • Eight event hub input partitions and blob storage output partitioned by a custom field with arbitrary cardinality
    • Eight blob storage input partitions and blob storage output
    • Eight blob storage input partitions and eight event hub output partitions

The following sections discuss some example scenarios that are embarrassingly parallel.

Simple query

  • Input: An event hub with eight partitions
  • Output: An event hub with eight partitions ("Partition key column" must be set to use PartitionId)

Query:

    --Using compatibility level 1.2 or above
    SELECT TollBoothId
    FROM Input1
    WHERE TollBoothId > 100
    
    --Using compatibility level 1.0 or 1.1
    SELECT TollBoothId
    FROM Input1 PARTITION BY PartitionId
    WHERE TollBoothId > 100

This query is a simple filter. Therefore, we don't need to worry about partitioning the input that is being sent to the event hub. Notice that jobs with compatibility level before 1.2 must include PARTITION BY PartitionId clause, so it fulfills requirement #2 from earlier. For the output, we need to configure the event hub output in the job to have the partition key set to PartitionId. One last check is to make sure that the number of input partitions is equal to the number of output partitions.

Query with a grouping key

  • Input: Event hub with eight partitions
  • Output: Blob storage

Query:

    --Using compatibility level 1.2 or above
    SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Input1
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId
    
    --Using compatibility level 1.0 or 1.1
    SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Input1 Partition By PartitionId
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId, PartitionId

This query has a grouping key. Therefore, the events grouped together must be sent to the same Event Hubs partition. Since in this example we group by TollBoothID, we should be sure that TollBoothID is used as the partition key when the events are sent to Event Hubs. Then in Azure Stream Analytics, you can use PARTITION BY PartitionId to inherit from this partition scheme and enable full parallelization. Since the output is blob storage, we don't need to worry about configuring a partition key value, as per requirement #4.

Example of scenarios that aren't* embarrassingly parallel

In the previous section, the article covered some embarrassingly parallel scenarios. In this section, you learn about scenarios that don't meet all the requirements to be embarrassingly parallel.

Mismatched partition count

  • Input: An event hub with eight partitions
  • Output: An event hub with 32 partitions

If the input partition count doesn't match the output partition count, the topology isn't embarrassingly parallel irrespective of the query. However we can still get some level of parallelization.

Query using non-partitioned output

  • Input: An event hub with eight partitions
  • Output: Power BI

Power BI output doesn't currently support partitioning. Therefore, this scenario isn't embarrassingly parallel.

Multi-step query with different PARTITION BY values

  • Input: Event hub with eight partitions
  • Output: Event hub with eight partitions
  • Compatibility level: 1.0 or 1.1

Query:

    WITH Step1 AS (
    SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId, PartitionId
    FROM Input1 Partition By PartitionId
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId, PartitionId
    )

    SELECT SUM(Count) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Step1 Partition By TollBoothId
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId

As you can see, the second step uses TollBoothId as the partitioning key. This step isn't the same as the first step, and it therefore requires us to do a shuffle.

Multi-step query with different PARTITION BY values

  • Input: Event hub with eight partitions ("Partition key column" not set, default to "PartitionId")
  • Output: Event hub with eight partitions ("Partition key column" must be set to use "TollBoothId")
  • Compatibility level - 1.2 or higher

Query:

    WITH Step1 AS (
    SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Input1
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId
    )

    SELECT SUM(Count) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Step1
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId

Compatibility level 1.2 or above enables parallel query execution by default. For example, query from the previous section will be partitioned as long as "TollBoothId" column is set as input Partition Key. PARTITION BY PartitionId clause isn't required.

Calculate the maximum streaming units of a job

The total number of streaming units that can be used by a Stream Analytics job depends on the number of steps in the query defined for the job and the number of partitions for each step.

Steps in a query

A query can have one or many steps. Each step is a subquery defined by the WITH keyword. The query that is outside the WITH keyword (one query only) is also counted as a step, such as the SELECT statement in the following query:

Query:

    WITH Step1 AS (
        SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId
        FROM Input1 Partition By PartitionId
        GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId, PartitionId
    )
    SELECT SUM(Count) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Step1
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute,3), TollBoothId

This query has two steps.

Note

This query is discussed in more detail later in the article.

Partition a step

Partitioning a step requires the following conditions:

  • The input source must be partitioned.
  • The SELECT statement of the query must read from a partitioned input source.
  • The query within the step must have the PARTITION BY keyword.

When a query is partitioned, the input events are processed and aggregated in separate partition groups, and outputs events are generated for each of the groups. If you want a combined aggregate, you must create a second nonpartitioned step to aggregate.

Calculate the max streaming units for a job

All nonpartitioned steps together can scale up to one streaming unit (SU V2s) for a Stream Analytics job. In addition, you can add one SU V2 for each partition in a partitioned step. You can see some examples in the following table.

Query Max SUs for the job
  • The query contains one step.
  • The step isn't partitioned.
 1 SU V2
  • The input data stream is partitioned by 16.
  • The query contains one step.
  • The step is partitioned.
 16 SU V2 (1 * 16 partitions)
  • The query contains two steps.
  • Neither of the steps is partitioned.
 1 SU V2
  • The input data stream is partitioned by 3.
  • The query contains two steps. The input step is partitioned and the second step isn't.
  • The SELECT statement reads from the partitioned input.
 4 SU V2s (3 for partitioned steps + 1 for nonpartitioned steps

Examples of scaling

The following query calculates the number of cars within a three-minute window going through a toll station that has three tollbooths. This query can be scaled up to one SU V2.

    SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Input1
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId, PartitionId

To use more SUs for the query, both the input data stream and the query must be partitioned. Since the data stream partition is set to 3, the following modified query can be scaled up to 3 SU V2s:

    SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Input1 Partition By PartitionId
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId, PartitionId

When a query is partitioned, the input events are processed and aggregated in separate partition groups. Output events are also generated for each of the groups. Partitioning can cause some unexpected results when the GROUP BY field isn't the partition key in the input data stream. For example, the TollBoothId field in the previous query isn't the partition key of Input1. The result is that the data from TollBooth #1 can be spread in multiple partitions.

Each of the Input1 partitions will be processed separately by Stream Analytics. As a result, multiple records of the car count for the same tollbooth in the same Tumbling window will be created. If the input partition key can't be changed, this problem can be fixed by adding a nonpartition step to aggregate values across partitions, as in the following example:

    WITH Step1 AS (
        SELECT COUNT(*) AS Count, TollBoothId
        FROM Input1 Partition By PartitionId
        GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId, PartitionId
    )

    SELECT SUM(Count) AS Count, TollBoothId
    FROM Step1
    GROUP BY TumblingWindow(minute, 3), TollBoothId

This query can be scaled to 4 SU V2s.

Note

If you are joining two streams, make sure that the streams are partitioned by the partition key of the column that you use to create the joins. Also make sure that you have the same number of partitions in both streams.

Achieving higher throughputs at scale

An embarrassingly parallel job is necessary but not sufficient to sustain a higher throughput at scale. Every storage system, and its corresponding Stream Analytics output, has variations on how to achieve the best possible write throughput. As with any at-scale scenario, there are some challenges that can be solved by using the right configurations. This section discusses configurations for a few common outputs and provides samples for sustaining ingestion rates of 1 K, 5 K, and 10 K events per second.

The following observations use a Stream Analytics job with stateless (passthrough) query, a basic JavaScript UDF that writes to Event Hubs, Azure SQL, or Azure Cosmos DB.

Event Hubs

Ingestion Rate (events per second) Streaming Units Output Resources
1 K 1/3 2 TU
5 K 1 6 TU
10 K 2 10 TU

The Event Hubs solution scales linearly in terms of streaming units (SU) and throughput, making it the most efficient and performant way to analyze and stream data out of Stream Analytics. Jobs can be scaled up to 66 SU V2s, which roughly translates to processing up to 400 MB/s, or 38 trillion events per day.

Azure SQL

Ingestion Rate (events per second) Streaming Units Output Resources
1 K 2/3 S3
5 K 3 P4
10 K 6 P6

Azure SQL supports writing in parallel, called Inherit Partitioning, but it's not enabled by default. However, enabling Inherit Partitioning, along with a fully parallel query, might not be sufficient to achieve higher throughputs. SQL write throughputs depend significantly on your database configuration and table schema. The SQL Output Performance article has more detail about the parameters that can maximize your write throughput. As noted in the Azure Stream Analytics output to Azure SQL Database article, this solution doesn't scale linearly as a fully parallel pipeline beyond 8 partitions and might need repartitioning before SQL output (see INTO). Premium SKUs are needed to sustain high IO rates along with overhead from log backups happening every few minutes.

Azure Cosmos DB

Ingestion Rate (events per second) Streaming Units Output Resources
1 K 2/3 20 K RU
5 K 4 60 K RU
10 K 8 120 K RU

Azure Cosmos DB output from Stream Analytics has been updated to use native integration under compatibility level 1.2. Compatibility level 1.2 enables significantly higher throughput and reduces RU consumption compared to 1.1, which is the default compatibility level for new jobs. The solution uses Azure Cosmos DB containers partitioned on /deviceId and the rest of solution is identically configured.

All Streaming at Scale Azure samples use Event Hubs as input that is fed by load simulating test clients. Each input event is a 1 KB JSON document, which translates configured ingestion rates to throughput rates (1 MB/s, 5 MB/s, and 10 MB/s) easily. Events simulate an IoT device sending the following JSON data (in a shortened form) for up to 1,000 devices:

{
    "eventId": "b81d241f-5187-40b0-ab2a-940faf9757c0",
    "complexData": {
        "moreData0": 51.3068118685458,
        "moreData22": 45.34076957651598
    },
    "value": 49.02278128887753,
    "deviceId": "contoso://device-id-1554",
    "type": "CO2",
    "createdAt": "2019-05-16T17:16:40.000003Z"
}

Note

The configurations are subject to change due to the various components used in the solution. For a more accurate estimate, customize the samples to fit your scenario.

Identifying Bottlenecks

Use the Metrics pane in your Azure Stream Analytics job to identify bottlenecks in your pipeline. Review Input/Output Events for throughput and "Watermark Delay" or Backlogged Events to see if the job is keeping up with the input rate. For Event Hubs metrics, look for Throttled Requests and adjust the Threshold Units accordingly. For Azure Cosmos DB metrics, review Max consumed RU/s per partition key range under Throughput to ensure your partition key ranges are uniformly consumed. For Azure SQL DB, monitor Log IO and CPU.

Get help

For further assistance, try our Microsoft Q&A question page for Azure Stream Analytics.

Next steps