Hi,
I struggled for days about this i18n issue. Can someone confirm that this is a bug or if I made something wrong whatsoever? How to declare a bug?
I created in the same RG two Logic Apps.
1st logic apps is seen by Sentinel as "Sentinel action" in playbooks but can't be mapped in Automation rule action.
"triggers": {
"Quand_la_règle_de_création_de_l’incident_Azure_Sentinel_a_été_créée": {
"inputs": {
"body": {
"callback_url": "@{listCallbackUrl()}"
},
"host": {
"connection": {
"name": "@parameters('$connections')['azuresentinel']['connectionId']"
}
},
"path": "/incident-creation"
},
"type": "ApiConnectionWebhook"
}
}
Second one is perfectly seen in Automation:
"triggers": {
"When_Azure_Sentinel_incident_creation_rule_was_triggered": {
"inputs": {
"body": {
"callback_url": "@{listCallbackUrl()}"
},
"host": {
"connection": {
"name": "@parameters('$connections')['azuresentinel']['connectionId']"
}
},
"path": "/incident-creation"
},
"type": "ApiConnectionWebhook"
}
}
It looks to me that Sentinel detection of trigger heavily depends on the name instead of static value. But I18n depends on what are languages in block creation.
Can anyone confirm?