question

bratuga avatar image
0 Votes"
bratuga asked LimitlessTechnology-2700 answered

Failover Cluster - CSV poor performance (HPE 3PAR 8200)

We have a 3PAR-8200 connected directly with FC to two DL360Gen10 servers.

The servers DL360Gen10 have the Windows Server Datacenter 2019 operating system installed. The two servers form a cluster, with only these two nodes. These two servers and the cluster service are used for virtualization, with the role of Hyper-V.

We also have 3PAR directly connected with FC to another cluster Windows 2012R2 , with two nodes, with exactly the same purpose, the Hyper-V service.

Since the installation of 3PAR in 2019, we have been contacting our partner, indicating the lack of performance of the storage equipment, comparing for example with an MSA-1040.

Several interventions were carried out, such as:

  • Volume configuration with Adaptive Optimization

  • Activation of Adaptive Cache

  • 3PAR upgrade

Over these three years, we have increased the use of space reaching 80%, and the justification for the poor performance of the equipment would be justified by this reason.

After many tests, we decided to format both servers and configure a cluster again and present new volumes to verificate if solve the problem. When presenting a volume to the cluster, if it is not configured as CSV, the performance is great, but after moment we pass the volume to CSV, the speed drops drastically to about 20%.

This issue happens with Windows Server version 2012R2 and 2019 in our case.

Searching several forums, including HP, we found several reports with the same scenario and the same problem, and in none of them, we see a solution to the problem.

In our case, in the 2012R2 cluster, we reconnected our old MSA-1040, without SSD disks, and it has much better performance than the 3PAR volumes.

Any ideas?

windows-server-hyper-vwindows-server-clustering
5 |1600 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 3.0 MiB each and 30.0 MiB total.

1 Answer

LimitlessTechnology-2700 avatar image
0 Votes"
LimitlessTechnology-2700 answered LimitlessTechnology-2700 published

Hi @bratuga

As you are comparing the performance of cluster-based on SSD it is always a good idea to have a systematic approach

When someone asks a question about why CSV performance does not match their expectations and how to investigate. The answer is that CSV consists of multiple layers, and the most straightforward troubleshooting approach is through a process of elimination to first remove all the layers, test the speed of the disk, and then start adding layers one by one until you find the one causing the issue.

In the below post, you can find if the performance that you observe on a Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) is what you expect and how to find which layer in your solution may be the bottleneck.

Cluster Shared Volume - A Systematic Approach to Finding Bottlenecks
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/failover-clustering/cluster-shared-volume-a-systematic-approach-to-finding/ba-p/372049

Hope this resolves your Query!!


--If the reply is helpful, please Upvote and Accept it as an answer–

5 |1600 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 3.0 MiB each and 30.0 MiB total.