Choosing the right authentication mechanism
When writing an application which interfaces with Azure DevOps Services, you will have to authenticate to gain access to resources like REST APIs. We understand that Azure DevOps Services offers many different ways to authenticate your application. This topic provides guidance to help you choose the right authentication for your application. The following table outlines the recommended authentication mechanism for different application types. We have provided basic descriptions, examples, and code samples to get you started.
|Type of application||Description||example||Authentication mechanism||Code samples|
|Interactive client-side (REST)||Client application, that allows user interaction, calling Azure DevOps Services REST APIs||Console application enumerating projects in an organization||Active Directory authentication library (ADAL)||sample|
|Interactive client-side (Client library)||Client application, that allows user interaction, calling Azure DevOps Services Client libraries||Console application enumerating bugs assigned to the current user||Client libraries||sample|
|Non-interactive client-side||Headless text only client side application||Console app displaying all bugs assigned to a user||Device Profile||sample|
|Interactive client-side app targeting Azure DevOps Services and TFS||Client application, that allows user interaction, authenticates Azure DevOps Services and TFS users||Console application allowing Azure DevOps Services and TFS users to see assigned bugs||Client Library (Interactive and Windows authentication)||sample|
|Interactive web||GUI based web application||Custom Web dashboard displaying build summaries||OAuth||sample|
|TFS application||TFS app using the Client OM library||TFS extension displaying team bug dashboards||Client Libraries||sample|
|Azure DevOps Services Extension||Azure DevOps Services extension||Agile Cards||VSS Web Extension SDK||sample walkthrough|
To learn more about how security and identity are managed, see About security and identity.
To learn more about how we store your credentials, see Credential storage for Azure DevOps.
Enabling IIS Basic Authentication invalidates using PATs for TFS
Learn more about using IIS Basic Authentication with TFS on-premises.
Q: I am making an interactive client-side application. Should I use Azure DevOps Services Client Libraries or Azure DevOps Services REST APIs?
A: We recommend using Azure DevOps Services Client Libraries over REST APIs when accessing Azure DevOps Services resources. They are simpler and more easily maintained when version changes to our REST endpoints occur. If there is missing functionality from the client libraries ADAL is the best authentication mechanism to use with our REST APIs.
Q: Can I use ADAL if I log into my organization with a Microsoft account (MSA)?
A: Yes, you can use ADAL to create client side applications for an MSA backed account using ADAL with some limitations. Instead of configuring ADAL with a
Client ID or
Reply URL from Azure Portal, MSA users can use the
Client ID: "872cd9fa-d31f-45e0-9eab-6e460a02d1f1" and
Reply URL: "urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob" as replacement values to get a valid ADAL access token without needing an Azure Active Directory.
Note: This approach will only work for client side applications. For JS web apps, ADAL JS will not work without an Azure AD tenant.
Q: Is this guidance only for Azure DevOps Services or is this also relevant for on-prem TFS users?
A: This guidance is mainly for Azure DevOps Services users. Client Libraries are a series of packages built specifically for extending TFS functionality. For on-prem users, we recommend using the Client Libraries, Windows Auth, or Personal Access Tokens (PATs) to authenticate on behalf of a user.
Q: What if I want my application to authenticate with both TFS and Azure DevOps Services?
A: The best practice is to have different authentication paths for TFS and Azure DevOps Services. You can use the requestContext to find out which you're hitting and then use the best mechanism for each. Alternatively, if you want a unified solution, PATs will work for both.
We'd love to hear your thoughts. Choose the type you'd like to provide:
Our feedback system is built on GitHub Issues. Read more on our blog.