Editorial service for technical content

SME: tysonn

​​To support basic quality in your content, you can request an editorial pass from our managed editorial service team.

Scope of service

  • The service is available to any technical article contributor, whether you are a content developer, program manager, or in another role.
  • The service is available only for C+E technical documentation that will be published to the documentation section of product websites or to TechNet, MSDN, or docs.microsoft.com.
  • This service is not intended for content that is not technical documentation (in other words, marketing content, blog posts, and other content that will not be published to a technical documentation library is not eligible for this service). If in doubt, please contact tysonn.
  • You can request the edit. Pull request reviewers may also refer authors' articles for edit.
  • Edits are usually performed post-publication.
  • This service is intended for individual article edits or small batches of edits. If you want to edit a collection of content (more than 10 articles), please contact tysonn and v-tamif to discuss.

To request an edit pass

  1. File a work request.

  2. In the work request, clearly explain the content you need edited – the ticket can be for one article or multiple articles. Please provide:

    • The name and URL to the GitHub repository.
    • If this is a repo outside the Azure product area, include instructions on how the editors obtain read permissions to your private repository.
    • A list of the articles that you want edited - provide the full production URL of each article.
    • If you know, please provide a link to the product specific style and terminology guide that applies to the content. The edit team applies a light touch based on the Microsoft Style Guide.
    • The URL to the master branch staging URL for the content you want edited.

​Understand the process

  • The baseline SLA for edit completion is 5 business days. However, the actual delivery of your edits will be based on volume of edit requests.
  • The preferred edit process is to edit content after it has been published. This is particularly true of content published from a Git-based repository.
  • Notification of start and completion of the edit is via the work item notification from TFS, so make sure you have TFS notifications enabled (Settings>Alerts>New). In GitHub, editors will use the @ syntax (@) in comments to let you know the edit is ready for review. These mentions send the mentioned user a notification.
  • When an edit is complete, the editor notifies the author that the edit is complete and ready for review through the TFS or GitHub notification mechanisms. The author has 5 business days to respond to the request.
  • If the author does not respond to the request for review within 5 business days, the editor will sign off on the edit. At this point, the author assumes responsibility for any issues introduced during the edit pass.

Finalize an edit

For GitHub-based content, the edits will be recorded in a pull request. When all edits are agreed to, the author adds the #sign-off comment to indicate the edit is ready to be merged.


Tyson (tysonn) – MSFT project owner and content business SME

Tami (v-tamif) – Aquent editorial service manager

Overall FY18 ​​Vendor Supported Quality Program

​The editorial service is one part of the overall support for content quality that Aquent provides to the APEX organization. For more info, see Vendor Supported Quality Program