Resource management in dense elastic pools
APPLIES TO: Azure SQL Database
Azure SQL Database elastic pools is a cost-effective solution for managing many databases with varying resource usage. All databases in an elastic pool share the same allocation of resources, such as CPU, memory, worker threads, storage space, tempdb, on the assumption that only a subset of databases in the pool will use compute resources at any given time. This assumption allows elastic pools to be cost-effective. Instead of paying for all resources each individual database could potentially need, customers pay for a much smaller set of resources, shared among all databases in the pool.
Resource sharing requires the system to carefully control resource usage to minimize the "noisy neighbor" effect, where a database with high resource consumption affects other databases in the same elastic pool. At the same time, the system must provide sufficient resources for features such as high availability and disaster recovery (HADR), backup and restore, monitoring, Query Store, Automatic tuning, etc. to function reliably.
Azure SQL Database achieves these goals by using multiple resource governance mechanisms, including Windows Job Objects for process level resource governance, Windows File Server Resource Manager (FSRM) for storage quota management, and a modified and extended version of SQL Server Resource Governor to implement resource governance within SQL Database.
The primary design goal of elastic pools is to be cost-effective. For this reason, the system intentionally allows customers to create dense pools, that is pools with the number of databases approaching or at the maximum allowed, but with a moderate allocation of compute resources. For the same reason, the system doesn't reserve all potentially needed resources for its internal processes, but allows resource sharing between internal processes and user workloads.
This approach allows customers to use dense elastic pools to achieve adequate performance and major cost savings. However, if the workload against many databases in a dense pool is sufficiently intense, resource contention becomes significant. Resource contention reduces user workload performance, and can negatively impact internal processes.
The number of databases that can be placed in dense pools without causing resource contention and performance problems depends on the number of concurrently active databases, and on resource consumption by user workloads in each database. This number can change over time as user workloads change.
Additionally, if the min vCores per database, or min DTUs per database setting is set to a value greater than 0, the maximum number of databases in the pool will be implicitly limited. For more information, see Database properties for pooled vCore databases and Database properties for pooled DTU databases.
When resource contention occurs in a densely packed pool, customers can choose one or more of the following actions to mitigate it:
- Tune query workload to reduce resource consumption, or spread resource consumption across multiple databases over time.
- Reduce pool density by moving some databases to another pool, or by making them standalone databases.
- Scale up the pool to get more resources.
For suggestions on how to implement the last two actions, see Operational recommendations later in this article. Reducing resource contention benefits both user workloads and internal processes, and lets the system reliably maintain expected level of service.
Monitoring resource consumption
To avoid performance degradation due to resource contention, customers using dense elastic pools should proactively monitor resource consumption, and take timely action if increasing resource contention starts affecting workloads. Continuous monitoring is important because resource usage in a pool changes over time, due to changes in user workload, changes in data volumes and distribution, changes in pool density, and changes in the Azure SQL Database service.
Azure SQL Database provides several metrics that are relevant for this type of monitoring. Exceeding the recommended average value for each metric indicates resource contention in the pool, and should be addressed using one of the actions mentioned earlier.
|Metric name||Description||Recommended average value|
||CPU utilization of the SQL process associated with an elastic pool, as measured by the underlying operating system. Available in the sys.dm_db_resource_stats view in every database, and in the sys.elastic_pool_resource_stats view in the
||Below 70%. Occasional short spikes up to 90% may be acceptable.|
||Worker thread utilization. Provided for each database in the pool, as well as for the pool itself. There are different limits on the number of worker threads at the database level, and at the pool level, therefore monitoring this metric at both levels is recommended. Available in the sys.dm_db_resource_stats view in every database, and in the sys.elastic_pool_resource_stats view in the
||Below 80%. Spikes up to 100% will cause connection attempts and queries to fail.|
||IOPS utilization for read and write physical IO. Provided for each database in the pool, as well as for the pool itself. There are different limits on the number of IOPS at the database level, and at the pool level, therefore monitoring this metric at both levels is recommended. Available in the sys.dm_db_resource_stats view in every database, and in the sys.elastic_pool_resource_stats view in the
||Below 80%. Occasional short spikes up to 100% may be acceptable.|
||Throughput utilizations for transaction log write IO. Provided for each database in the pool, as well as for the pool itself. There are different limits on the log throughput at the database level, and at the pool level, therefore monitoring this metric at both levels is recommended. Available in the sys.dm_db_resource_stats view in every database, and in the sys.elastic_pool_resource_stats view in the
||Below 90%. Occasional short spikes up to 100% may be acceptable.|
||The rate of out-of-memory (OOM) errors in an elastic pool, which is an indicator of memory pressure. Available in the sys.dm_resource_governor_resource_pools_history_ex view. See Examples for a sample query to calculate this metric.||0|
||Total storage space used by data in all databases within an elastic pool. Does not include empty space in database files. Available in the sys.elastic_pool_resource_stats view in the
||Below 80%. Can approach 100% for pools with no data growth.|
||Total storage space used by database files in storage in all databases within an elastic pool. Includes empty space in database files. Available in the sys.elastic_pool_resource_stats view in the
||Below 90%. Can approach 100% for pools with no data growth.|
||Transaction log space utilization in the
||Below 50%. Occasional spikes up to 80% are acceptable.|
In addition to these metrics, Azure SQL Database provides a view that returns actual resource governance limits, as well as additional views that return resource utilization statistics at the resource pool level, and at the workload group level.
|sys.dm_user_db_resource_governance||Returns actual configuration and capacity settings used by resource governance mechanisms in the current database or elastic pool.|
|sys.dm_resource_governor_resource_pools||Returns information about the current resource pool state, the current configuration of resource pools, and cumulative resource pool statistics.|
|sys.dm_resource_governor_workload_groups||Returns cumulative workload group statistics and the current configuration of the workload group. This view can be joined with sys.dm_resource_governor_resource_pools on the
|sys.dm_resource_governor_resource_pools_history_ex||Returns resource pool utilization statistics for the last 32 minutes. Each row represents a 20-second interval. The
|sys.dm_resource_governor_workload_groups_history_ex||Returns workload group utilization statistics for the last 32 minutes. Each row represents a 20-second interval. The
To query these and other dynamic management views using a principal other than server administrator, add this principal to the
##MS_ServerStateReader## server role.
These views can be used to monitor resource utilization and troubleshoot resource contention in near real-time. User workload on the primary and readable secondary replicas, including geo-replicas, is classified into the
SloSharedPool1 resource pool and
UserPrimaryGroup.DBId[N] workload group, where
N stands for the database ID value.
In addition to monitoring current resource utilization, customers using dense pools can maintain historical resource utilization data in a separate data store. This data can be used in predictive analysis to proactively manage resource utilization based on historical and seasonal trends.
Leave sufficient resource headroom. If resource contention and performance degradation occurs, mitigation may involve moving some databases out of the affected elastic pool, or scaling up the pool, as noted earlier. However, these actions require additional compute resources to complete. In particular, for Premium and Business Critical pools, these actions require transferring all data for the databases being moved, or for all databases in the elastic pool if the pool is scaled up. Data transfer is a long running and resource-intensive operation. If the pool is already under high resource pressure, the mitigating operation itself will degrade performance even further. In extreme cases, it may not be possible to solve resource contention via database move or pool scale-up because the required resources are not available. In this case, temporarily reducing query workload on the affected elastic pool may be the only solution.
Customers using dense pools should closely monitor resource utilization trends as described earlier, and take mitigating action while metrics remain within the recommended ranges and there are still sufficient resources in the elastic pool.
Resource utilization depends on multiple factors that change over time for each database and each elastic pool. Achieving optimal price/performance ratio in dense pools requires continuous monitoring and rebalancing, that is moving databases from more utilized pools to less utilized pools, and creating new pools as necessary to accommodate increased workload.
Do not move "hot" databases. If resource contention at the pool level is primarily caused by a small number of highly utilized databases, it may be tempting to move these databases to a less utilized pool, or make them standalone databases. However, doing this while a database remains highly utilized is not recommended, because the move operation will further degrade performance, both for the database being moved, and for the entire pool. Instead, either wait until high utilization subsides, or move less utilized databases instead to relieve resource pressure at the pool level. But moving databases with very low utilization does not provide any benefit in this case, because it does not materially reduce resource utilization at the pool level.
Create new databases in a "quarantine" pool. In scenarios where new databases are created frequently, such as applications using the tenant-per-database model, there is risk that a new database placed into an existing elastic pool will unexpectedly consume significant resources and affect other databases and internal processes in the pool. To mitigate this risk, create a separate "quarantine" pool with ample allocation of resources. Use this pool for new databases with yet unknown resource consumption patterns. Once a database has stayed in this pool for a business cycle, such as a week or a month, and its resource consumption is known, it can be moved to a pool with sufficient capacity to accommodate this additional resource usage.
Monitor both used and allocated space. When allocated pool space (total size of all database files in storage for all databases in a pool) reaches maximum pool size, out-of-space errors may occur. If allocated space trends high and is on track to reach maximum pool size, mitigation options include:
- Move some databases out of the pool to reduce total allocated space
- Shrink database files to reduce empty allocated space in files
- Scale up the pool to a service objective with a larger maximum pool size
If used pool space (total size of data in all databases in a pool, not including empty space in files) trends high and is on track to reach maximum pool size, mitigation options include:
- Move some databases out of the pool to reduce total used space
- Move (archive) data outside of the database, or delete no longer needed data
- Implement data compression
- Scale up the pool to a service objective with a larger maximum pool size
Avoid overly dense servers. Azure SQL Database supports up to 5000 databases per server. Customers using elastic pools with thousands of databases may consider placing multiple elastic pools on a single server, with the total number of databases up to the supported limit. However, servers with many thousands of databases create operational challenges. Operations that require enumerating all databases on a server, for example viewing databases in the portal, will be slower. Operational errors, such as incorrect modification of server level logins or firewall rules, will affect a larger number of databases. Accidental deletion of the server will require assistance from Microsoft Support to recover databases on the deleted server, and will cause a prolonged outage for all affected databases.
It is recommended to limit the number of databases per server to a lower number than the maximum supported. In many scenarios, using up to 1000-2000 databases per server is optimal. To reduce the likelihood of accidental server deletion, place a delete lock on the server or its resource group.
Monitoring memory utilization
This query calculates the
oom_per_second metric for each resource pool, over the last 32 minutes. This query can be executed in any database in an elastic pool.
SELECT pool_id, name AS resource_pool_name, IIF(name LIKE 'SloSharedPool%' OR name LIKE 'UserPool%', 'user', 'system') AS resource_pool_type, SUM(CAST(delta_out_of_memory_count AS decimal))/(SUM(duration_ms)/1000.) AS oom_per_second FROM sys.dm_resource_governor_resource_pools_history_ex GROUP BY pool_id, name ORDER BY pool_id;
tempdb log space utilization
This query returns the current value of the
tempdb_log_used_percent metric, showing the relative utilization of the
tempdb transaction log relative to its maximum allowed size. This query can be executed in any database in an elastic pool.
SELECT (lsu.used_log_space_in_bytes / df.log_max_size_bytes) * 100 AS tempdb_log_space_used_percent FROM tempdb.sys.dm_db_log_space_usage AS lsu CROSS JOIN ( SELECT SUM(CAST(max_size AS bigint)) * 8 * 1024. AS log_max_size_bytes FROM tempdb.sys.database_files WHERE type_desc = N'LOG' ) AS df ;
- For an introduction to elastic pools, see Elastic pools help you manage and scale multiple databases in Azure SQL Database.
- For information on tuning query workloads to reduce resource utilization, see Monitoring and tuning, and Monitoring and performance tuning.