Modifies XAML markup compile behavior when
x:Class is also provided. Instead of creating a partial class that is based on
x:Class, the provided
x:Class is created as an intermediate class, and then your provided derived class is expected to be based on
XAML Attribute Usage
<object x:Class="namespace.classname" x:Subclass="subclassNamespace.subclassName"> ... </object>
||Optional. Specifies a CLR namespace that contains
||Required. Specifies the CLR name of the partial class that connects the loaded XAML and your code-behind for that XAML. See Remarks.|
||Optional. Can be different from
||Required. Specifies the CLR name of the subclass.|
x:Class Directive must also be provided on the same object, and that object must be the root element of the XAML production.
x:Subclass usage is primarily intended for languages that do not support partial class declarations.
The class used as the
x:Subclass cannot be a nested class, and
x:Subclass must refer to the root object as explained in the "Dependencies" section.
Otherwise, the conceptual meaning of
x:Subclass is undefined by a .NET Framework XAML Services implementation. This is because .NET Framework XAML Services behavior does not specify the overall programming model by which XAML markup and backing code are connected. Implementations of further concepts related to
x:Subclass are performed by specific frameworks that use programming models or application models to define how to connect XAML markup, compiled markup, and CLR-based code-behind. Each framework might have its own build actions that enable some of the behavior, or specific components that must be included in the build environment. Within a framework, build actions can also vary based on the specific CLR language that is used for the code-behind.
WPF Usage Notes
x:Subclass can be on a page root or on the Application root in the application definition, which already has
x:Subclass on any element other than a page or application root, or specifying it where no
x:Class exists, causes a compile-time error.
Creating derived classes that work correctly for the
x:Subclass scenario is fairly complex. You might need to examine the intermediate files (the .g files produced in the obj folder of your project by markup compile, with names that incorporate the .xaml file names). These intermediate files can help you determine the origin of certain programming constructs in the joined partial classes in the compiled application.
Event handlers in the derived class must be
internal override (
Friend Overrides in Microsoft Visual Basic) in order to override the stubs for the handlers as created in the intermediate class during compilation. Otherwise, the derived class implementations hide (shadow) the intermediate class implementation and the intermediate class handlers are not invoked.
When you define both
x:Subclass, you do not need to provide any implementation for the class that is referenced by
x:Class. You only need to give it a name via the
x:Class attribute so that the compiler has some guidance for the class that it creates in the intermediate files (the compiler does not select a default name in this case). You can give the
x:Class class an implementation; however, this is not the typical scenario for using both
We'd love to hear your thoughts. Choose the type you'd like to provide:
Our feedback system is built on GitHub Issues. Read more on our blog.