Maximizing rowgroup quality for columnstore
Rowgroup quality is determined by the number of rows in a rowgroup. Increasing the available memory can maximize the number of rows a columnstore index compresses into each rowgroup. Use these methods to improve compression rates and query performance for columnstore indexes.
Why the rowgroup size matters
Since a columnstore index scans a table by scanning column segments of individual rowgroups, maximizing the number of rows in each rowgroup enhances query performance. When rowgroups have a high number of rows, data compression improves which means there is less data to read from disk.
For more information about rowgroups, see Columnstore Indexes Guide.
Target size for rowgroups
For best query performance, the goal is to maximize the number of rows per rowgroup in a columnstore index. A rowgroup can have a maximum of 1,048,576 rows. It's okay to not have the maximum number of rows per rowgroup. Columnstore indexes achieve good performance when rowgroups have at least 100,000 rows.
Rowgroups can get trimmed during compression
During a bulk load or columnstore index rebuild, sometimes there isn't enough memory available to compress all the rows designated for each rowgroup. When there is memory pressure, columnstore indexes trim the rowgroup sizes so compression into the columnstore can succeed.
When there is insufficient memory to compress at least 10,000 rows into each rowgroup, SQL Data Warehouse generates an error.
For more information on bulk loading, see Bulk load into a clustered columnstore index.
How to monitor rowgroup quality
The DMV sys.dm_pdw_nodes_db_column_store_row_group_physical_stats (sys.dm_db_column_store_row_group_physical_stats contains the view definition matching SQL DB to SQL Data Warehouse) that exposes useful information such as number of rows in rowgroups and the reason for trimming if there was trimming. You can create the following view as a handy way to query this DMV to get information on rowgroup trimming.
create view dbo.vCS_rg_physical_stats as with cte as ( select tb.[name] AS [logical_table_name] , rg.[row_group_id] AS [row_group_id] , rg.[state] AS [state] , rg.[state_desc] AS [state_desc] , rg.[total_rows] AS [total_rows] , rg.[trim_reason_desc] AS trim_reason_desc , mp.[physical_name] AS physical_name FROM sys.[schemas] sm JOIN sys.[tables] tb ON sm.[schema_id] = tb.[schema_id] JOIN sys.[pdw_table_mappings] mp ON tb.[object_id] = mp.[object_id] JOIN sys.[pdw_nodes_tables] nt ON nt.[name] = mp.[physical_name] JOIN sys.[dm_pdw_nodes_db_column_store_row_group_physical_stats] rg ON rg.[object_id] = nt.[object_id] AND rg.[pdw_node_id] = nt.[pdw_node_id] AND rg.[distribution_id] = nt.[distribution_id] ) select * from cte;
The trim_reason_desc tells whether the rowgroup was trimmed(trim_reason_desc = NO_TRIM implies there was no trimming and row group is of optimal quality). The following trim reasons indicate premature trimming of the rowgroup:
- BULKLOAD: This trim reason is used when the incoming batch of rows for the load had less than 1 million rows. The engine will create compressed row groups if there are greater than 100,000 rows being inserted (as opposed to inserting into the delta store) but sets the trim reason to BULKLOAD. In this scenario, consider increasing your batch load to include more rows. Also, reevaluate your partitioning scheme to ensure it is not too granular as row groups cannot span partition boundaries.
- MEMORY_LIMITATION: To create row groups with 1 million rows, a certain amount of working memory is required by the engine. When available memory of the loading session is less than the required working memory, row groups get prematurely trimmed. The following sections explain how to estimate memory required and allocate more memory.
- DICTIONARY_SIZE: This trim reason indicates that rowgroup trimming occurred because there was at least one string column with wide and/or high cardinality strings. The dictionary size is limited to 16 MB in memory and once this limit is reached the row group is compressed. If you do run into this situation, consider isolating the problematic column into a separate table.
How to estimate memory requirements
The maximum required memory to compress one rowgroup is approximately
- 72 MB +
- #rows * #columns * 8 bytes +
- #rows * #short-string-columns * 32 bytes +
- #long-string-columns * 16 MB for compression dictionary
where short-string-columns use string data types of <= 32 bytes and long-string-columns use string data types of > 32 bytes.
Long strings are compressed with a compression method designed for compressing text. This compression method uses a dictionary to store text patterns. The maximum size of a dictionary is 16 MB. There is only one dictionary for each long string column in the rowgroup.
For an in-depth discussion of columnstore memory requirements, see the video Azure SQL Data Warehouse scaling: configuration and guidance.
Ways to reduce memory requirements
Use the following techniques to reduce the memory requirements for compressing rowgroups into columnstore indexes.
Use fewer columns
If possible, design the table with fewer columns. When a rowgroup is compressed into the columnstore, the columnstore index compresses each column segment separately. Therefore the memory requirements to compress a rowgroup increase as the number of columns increases.
Use fewer string columns
Columns of string data types require more memory than numeric and date data types. To reduce memory requirements, consider removing string columns from fact tables and putting them in smaller dimension tables.
Additional memory requirements for string compression:
- String data types up to 32 characters can require 32 additional bytes per value.
- String data types with more than 32 characters are compressed using dictionary methods. Each column in the rowgroup can require up to an additional 16 MB to build the dictionary.
Columnstore indexes create one or more rowgroups per partition. In SQL Data Warehouse, the number of partitions grows quickly because the data is distributed and each distribution is partitioned. If the table has too many partitions, there might not be enough rows to fill the rowgroups. The lack of rows does not create memory pressure during compression, but it leads to rowgroups that do not achieve the best columnstore query performance.
Another reason to avoid over-partitioning is there is a memory overhead for loading rows into a columnstore index on a partitioned table. During a load, many partitions could receive the incoming rows, which are held in memory until each partition has enough rows to be compressed. Having too many partitions creates additional memory pressure.
Simplify the load query
The database shares the memory grant for a query among all the operators in the query. When a load query has complex sorts and joins, the memory available for compression is reduced.
Design the load query to focus only on loading the query. If you need to run transformations on the data, run them separate from the load query. For example, stage the data in a heap table, run the transformations, and then load the staging table into the columnstore index. You can also load the data first and then use the MPP system to transform the data.
Each distribution compresses rowgroups into the columnstore in parallel when there is more than one CPU core available per distribution. The parallelism requires additional memory resources, which can lead to memory pressure and rowgroup trimming.
To reduce memory pressure, you can use the MAXDOP query hint to force the load operation to run in serial mode within each distribution.
CREATE TABLE MyFactSalesQuota WITH (DISTRIBUTION = ROUND_ROBIN) AS SELECT * FROM FactSalesQuota OPTION (MAXDOP 1);
Ways to allocate more memory
DWU size and the user resource class together determine how much memory is available for a user query. To increase the memory grant for a load query, you can either increase the number of DWUs or increase the resource class.
- To increase the DWUs, see How do I scale performance?
- To change the resource class for a query, see Change a user resource class example.
To find more ways to improve performance in SQL Data Warehouse, see the Performance overview.
Send feedback about: